| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 31 post(s) |
Abus Finkel
Caldari Capital Construction Inc.
5
   |
Posted - 2013.02.12 16:26:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:I've never agreed with it. My stance of "Don't modify the client" hasn't changed since day one. That GMs for some reason have a different interpretation than I do is irrelevant.
CCP Sreegs wrote:In my opinion cache scraping is illegal. You won't be banned for it today. I didn't see any questions asked what I saw was insults and accusations. Sorry if you have a different interpretation of polite social discourse.
Do you really consider read-only access to cache files as client modification?
Do you really consider me reading files stored on my own computer as being illegal? Are you aware that there's a huge difference between EULAs and actual laws? |
Abus Finkel
Caldari Capital Construction Inc.
6
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 19:26:00 -
[2] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:I think it goes a bit deeper than that. The tone of the OP on the E-Uni forums was obviously geared towards making this a personal attack from CCP on E-Uni. IMO he implicitly endorsed botting and attempted to hold (hundreds of?) noob accounts over CCP's head to force them to give him the ISK. It's made worse by the fact that he knew all of this beforehand.
I'm not sure from where you are getting that he supports botting or even wants the isk back. The heart of the matter is (in my opinion at least) this:
Kelduum Revaan wrote:The petition was answered by the same CCP member, with another canned response, stating that there is no escalation for security matters and that they operate separately from customer support, the matter had been brought to the attention of their Director of Security, and to respond if I have any questions or concerns.
And then, its no longer about the ISK.
I started to become quite worried. The dialogue at this point suggests that the security team are operating with no oversight at all, and implies that there is no auditing or checks and balances for their actions, especially as there is no recourse for anyone who wishes to dispute their claims.
Which I believe CCP Sreegs has addressed in this thread, and I think if that had just been communicated to Kelduum in private he wouldn't have taken this public at all.
I like this game and I like most things CCP has done with it recently, but I think most people will agree with me that communication is not their strongest side. |
Abus Finkel
Caldari Capital Construction Inc.
6
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 19:35:00 -
[3] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Abus Finkel wrote:
Which I believe CCP Sreegs has addressed in this thread, and I think if that had just been communicated to Kelduum in private he wouldn't have taken this public at all.
I like this game and I like most things CCP has done with it recently, but I think most people will agree with me that communication is not their strongest side.
He was told. He didn't like the answer and so started many threads.
How do you know that? Have you read CCP's responses to his petitions?
All we know is that CCP Sreegs says he was told and Kelduum says he wasn't. |
| |
|